More servicesWindows Live
HomeHotmailSpacesOneCare
 
MSN
Sign in
 
 
Spaces home  Welcome to JakeSherlock....PhotosProfileFriendsMore Tools Explore the Spaces community

Welcome to JakeSherlock.com

Now sporting an all-new redesign
Stuff I read
August 14

We're heading out

Just a quick note to say I'm going offline for a few days. We're off for a vacation to see the family, and I'll only have limited Internet access. But I will be texting updates to Twitter, so check me out there.

In the meantime, read my friend Kim's blog. She was nice enough to put me on her blog roll a week ago and I haven't returned the favor until now.
August 11

John Edwards and the press -- did he get a pass?

I know I'm late to the blogosphere's party about John Edwards, but I wanted to actually take some time to think through all the facets of this story before commenting. And after reading many, many articles on the affair, the political fallout, the shady payment, etc. etc., I can conclude a few things:

  1. The National Enquirer gets a gold star for being first and being right. But I'm also docking it two gold stars for paying for the story. The reason nobody takes the Enquirer seriously is because of ethical breeches like that (the "tabloid" design doesn't help either, nor does its placement next to the Weekly Word News, Star, et al). The Enquirer actually has a pretty good track record as far as reporting big stories. Now, if it would just take the high road in its reporting, maybe it would win some credibility and some extra readership.
  2. John Edwards is a two-faced scumbag politician. He cheated on his wife who is battling cancer and funneled campaign cash to his mistress for making a grand total of four videos. And remember, he was the moral of the Democratic candidates for president, the one who cared about the "other America" in his "Two Americas" scenario. I still agree that scenario exists (just look at the rich-poor gap) and has for years, but he clearly was only paying lip service to the part about caring. Or, as politicians call it, "campaigning."
  3. The mainstream media played the story too safe, which I attribute to the largely debunked piece the New York Times ran on John McCain about six months ago. The allegations in that story -- that McCain was cheating on his wife -- were based solely on anonymous sources. McCain vehemently denied it, and I think most people believed him. Now, another story about a presidential contender comes along -- one who is out of the race already -- and why would you run the risk of embarrassing yourself the way the Times did?
So, back to the point of this post: Did Edwards get a pass from the media? With a few exceptions -- notably, and ironically, the Enquirer -- Edwards most certainly did get a pass. He was able to release the story on his terms, and he chose a time when fewer people would talk about it. Hey, it's hard to beat Friday afternoon on the same day that the Olympics start.

Somehow, I expect we'll see John Edwards again. Certainly nowhere near the White House unless he's an invited guest. But he'll lay low for a few years and show back up again, probably in some type of partnership with Al Gore on some TV/advocacy project. I'm not rooting for the guy or anything, that's just my predication of what will happen.

I will say I feel mighty letdown by a guy whose message resonated at least somewhat with me. I liked his progressive mindset, and I appreciated his candor when he said that he was wrong in voting for the Iraq War (although I thought then as I do now that that was more of a strategic move than an honest confession; still, it was nice to hear). And, most importantly, he misused his campaign funds to pay for his girlfriend.

A real moral choice John Edwards turned out to be.
August 01

Memories of Grandma Charlene

 Grandma Charlene was the embodiment of the old cliche, "Behind every successful man is a great woman."

The physical differences between the two of them couldn't have been more exaggerated. Grandpa was built like a brick shithouse: Tall, thick as an oak (but mostly muscle) and strong as an ox. Grandma was petite and short, but also toned and healthy, which happens when you and your husband are big golfers.

Grandpa had squinty eyes that often made him appear asleep. Grandma wore glasses, and they accentuated her eyes to be just a little above normal, or they only appeared that way compared to Grandpa's.

Grandpa was the extrovert. He was the authoritarian, the high school principal and football coach (oh, how he was disappointed the day I quit football in 7th grade. And after only 3 days, too). Grandma was the introvert, but she too didn't tolerate any nonsense. But if you were willing to chill out, have a conversation and watch her go about her household chores, she was sweet as pie. She'd listen to my stories of life on the school yard, who was picking on me, which girl I thought was cute, which team I thought would be really good in the NFL that year (I was obsessed when I was a kid), etc. etc.

And she made sure to instill in me the importance of a good education. She and Grandpa gave me savings bonds every year for Christmas and my birthday, and those helped me get through college. They stayed on me about getting good grades and stressed that without a college education, I wouldn't amount to much. And I believed them.

I'll miss her and always remember the good times we had together. Like when you'd take me shopping at Pamida, or how you and Grandpa always drove me to the Shriners Hospital for surgery and regular checkups. I might not be able to walk today without your support.

And then there were the awkward times, like when you were holding Matt's hand and he jumped down the stairs and nearly took you with him. Or the time I swiped the check when we went out to eat and paid. I love how you and Grandpa included the exact amount of the check in my next birthday card.

Charlene Parker was a wonderful grandma, a role model and a helluva golfer. I'll miss you.

July 31

My Grandma's obituary

Charlene Parker (Caroline Columbine Charlene Manita Baird Brixey Parker) died on July 23 in Greeley, Colo. She was 81.

Charlene was born in Lewis, Colo., on Jan. 6, 1927, to Lloyd Aaron and Doris Eva Baird Brixey. She was one of four children. She married the love of her life, Jerry Parker of Coleman, Texas, on June 1, 1952.

Charlene attended schools around the Cortez area, graduating from Montezuma County High School in Cortez. She went on to further her education graduating from business school in Albuquerque, N.M. She was employed by the State of Colorado Department of Employment Security and a lawyersʼ office in Cortez, before marrying Jerry. She and Jerry owned the Inn Town Motel and managed the Purple Sage Golf Course for several years.

Charlene was an active member of the Purple Sage Golf Club. She participated in the Womenʼs Golf League, Thursday Ladiesʼ Day and won several City and Club Championships. She was also a member of the Uinta County museum board. 

Charlene is preceded in death by her husband, Jerry Parker; her parents and two sisters, Lois Louise Brixey Hayes and Doris Ruth Brixey French. She is also preceded in death by her brother PFC Lloyd Aaron Brixey, Jr. who was killed in the battle of Saipan on June 24, 1944.

Charlene is survived by her family; Bruce Brixey Parker and his wife Becki and their children Jessee, Matthew and Aaron Parker and Michaela, Jacki and Kati Rathbun; Jerri Kim Parker; and Trish Parker Dinnel and her husband Don and their children Dusty and Kaila Dinnel.

Graveside services will be held at 10 a.m., July 29, at the Evanston City Cemetery. In lieu of flowers donations in her memory to the Shrinersʼ Hospitals for Children, Fairfax Road at Virginia Street, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84103, would be very appreciated.
July 29

Let's talk about Obama for a second, OK?

Believe it or not, I've not made up my mind about the presidential race yet.

I have serious misgivings about both candidates. I'll save my rant of why John McCain of 2008 is no John McCain of 2000 for another blog entry. For now, let's focus on Obama.

The hate mail circulating the Internet about Obama is enormous. At first, I just laughed it off. I thought nobody could really believe some of the whoppers about him out there, like his supposed radical-Islamic upbringing.

But just do a search on Snopes for Obama (or click here; I've already done it for you) and you'll find no shortage of articles refuting as many as 50 lies in one e-mail forward. I'm not paying lip service to it here. Instead, I'm going to offer up some truth about the senator from Illinois.

Here's what I don't like about Obama:

  • His lack of experience. The guy is still in his first term as senator. He otherwise spent seven years in a state legislature, and that's about it. Oh, and he gave one rousing speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. 
No time as a state governor. No executive branch experience, in other words. That's worrisome.
  • His health-care plan. I understand why people want universal health care -- our system sucks. Unless you're in the insurance industry, then you're making huge bucks.
So why not universal health care? Because I favor private industry, and I mean true private industry. The medical field would be tons more affordable if you got the greed out of the system. Start with tort reform, so that idiots who don't follow doctor's orders can't walk away with money for nothing. Once the reform is in place, malpractice comes down. With malpractice down, fees can come down. So can insurance premiums and deductibles.

At the same time, we need to open the prescription drug market to free enterprise. If Canada can sell the goods cheaper, let us buy them. The American companies will drop the price to compete. Drop it like a rock.

To be fair, universal health care has its good points. I saw Sicko, and it's not nearly as evil as the Sean Hannitys of the world would have you believe. I know I'd rather try the systems countries like Canada, Britain and Cuba have adopted than continue to hemorrage money in our system. But I do believe the free market -- a true free market -- is the better idea.

  • Gay marriage. Obama favors civil unions but not gay marriage. Sorry, but civil unions is like creating a new form of segregation. Just let them get married already. Hell, we let Britney Spears do it twice.

Here's what I like about Obama (kind of):
  • The economy. OK, the man is on the record as saying those making more than $250,000 will see the Bush tax cuts expire. Nobody else. That's his plan. Are you in that $250,000 category? If you said no, I'm under that, quit your complaining. If anything, some of Obama's policies are actually going to help you. Like his credit card bill of rights
Now, I don't necessarily like his economic policy. I think our tax code is far too complicated and convoluted, and it's been manipulated so much that it's ruined. He may talk about closing loopholes, but can he actually do it? Haven't we heard that line before? I wish him luck, but I don't think it's going to be all that effective.

At the same time, the rich/poor divide in this country has gotten out of hand. The deficit is nearing $10 trillion. The dollar is devalued. The solution? A flat tax.

You know why I like the idea of a flat tax? Because it's fair. You pay your X percent, I'll pay my X percent, and we'll be even-steven. You're not penalized for your success, and I'm not expected to carry your tax burden. And depending on X, you could set it at a point where it goes down as the deficit goes down.

Beyond that, we need someone who will instill a sense of spendthriftness on government. Cut out the B.S. pet projects and fix some bridges, damnit.

  • Foreign policy/Iraq. OK, first, I saw an e-mail a while back blasting Obama for claiming to be against the war when he wasn't even in the Senate yet. But guess what? We all have an opinion about the war, and if he knew it stunk from the beginning, well, he had his eyes and ears open to the little bit of skepticism that was out there at the time. Good for him. Seems like a good instinct to have in a president.
Next, did you see where Iraq's prime minister likes Obama's withdrawal plan? Good man, that Al-Maliki.

Iraq is looking good right now, and that's a testament to our troops! God bless those who gave their lives for this war. They weren't properly equipped or taken care of by their own government when the operation began, the post-invasion planning was a joke, and the whole reason for going there in the first place is at best suspect. Yes, our troops still went out and got the job done. God bless them. Now get them the hell out of harm's way already.

As for the "grave sin" of talking to our enemies like Syria, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, etc., etc., why not? What is so wrong with peace talks? What is this, junior high? We don't like how you're acting, so we're not talking to you? Please. I'd much rather we be talking to that maniac in Iran than ignoring him. Better to take him head on than to turn your back and stick out your tongue.

View more entries
 

Jake Sherlock

View spaceSend a message
Occupation:
Age:
Location:
I'm an instructor and news editor with the Missouri School of Journalism's newspaper, the Columbia Missourian. I've been a newspaper editor, designer and reporter for more than 10 years.
Here are some of my other online haunts